Identity Management Cloud solutions
Companies deploy identity and access management systems for a variety of reasons, and each of these can be tied directly to a real financial benefit. Whether it’s increasing security (and thereby avoiding costly security breaches or data loss), automating application provisioning (thereby saving IT staff’s time) or providing SSO across all devices (reducing employees’ wasted time managing forgotten passwords), IAM contributes to the bottom line in meaningful ways. For example, during Enterasys Networks’ three year-deployment of Okta, the network infrastructure and security provider was able to achieve a 652% 3-year risk-adjusted ROI with a payback of two months. (Read the full October 2012 commissioned case study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Okta here.)
Given such strong results, we thought it might be worth digging deeper to compare the financial benefits of different types of IAM. Luckily, Forrester Research, Inc., recently did exactly that in a detailed report (“Use Commercial IAM Solutions to Achieve More than 100% ROI Over Manual Processes, Forrester Research, Inc.”) comparing four different scenarios for identity and access management. The full Forrester Research report is available to Okta partners and customers (current and future), and I’ve included a synopsis below of the four methods of identity and access management Forrester cites — and why cloud IAM is the clear winner:
- Manual identity management processes
- Build-your-own on-premises solution
- Buy commercial on-premises IAM solution
- Deploy an IAM solution that is delivered from the cloud
Using a comprehensive analysis, Forrester found that of these four scenarios, a cloud-based IAM service “offers the greatest benefits for SMBs.” That may seem obvious, but given all of the claims made by various vendors, it’s helpful to have a clear analysis to guide the discussion. From the report:
Using Manual IAM Processes Will “Burn Lots of Money”
Forrester found, without looking at net present values and just looking at IAM costs for three years, that a sample company will “spend nearly twice as much on manual processes for security and attestation as on automated ones. As the end user population increases, manual processes simply become less efficient and less tenable.”
You might also like
BENIGN INDIFFERENCE TO SPAMby FWLittle
Anonymous posters all to often have bad habits of rudeness, misinformation and deliberate fraud. Take the posting of SPAM. It's certainly not the purpose of most forums. Yet, spam is posted and remains posted; in fact it gets pasted and posted again, day after day.
Gilding the Lilly - I: Then that posted SPAM gets endorsed. Instead of getting flagged, it gets endorsed!
Gilding the Lilly - II: That posted SPAM, unremoved, unflagged, multiple times reposted, receives replies. Instead of initially being removed, instead of initially being flagged, instead of being removed 3X, it gets endorsed, then replied to; instead of being identified, it's not removed, flagged or punished
ISSE 2010 Securing Electronic Business Processes: Highlights of the Information Security Solutions Europe 2010 Conference
Book (Vieweg+Teubner Verlag)
WSO2 CTO to Present Keynote on Open Standards for Identity Management at ..
— Virtual-Strategy Magazine
In his keynote presentation, “Open Standards for Identity: Understanding the Landscape,” Paul will look at identity management best practices and how open standards are evolving to handle the complexities of identity management and assurance.
The Career Fitness Program: Exercising your Options (8th Edition)
Book (Prentice Hall)
Symantec Norton AntiVirus 2013 For 10 Users - Windows
Norton 360 Everywhere - 1 yr Protection for up to 5 Devices [Old Version]
Sony VAIO SVP11214CXS 11.6-Inch Touchscreen Ultrabook (Carbon Silver)
Personal Computer (Sony)