Performance monitoring systems Ltd // IT Management Solutions

Performance monitoring systems Ltd

“Agents versus Agentless” is a very old debate within IT circles. Like many persistent arguments, any given version of it usually ends with “it depends”. It is a pros-and-cons weighing exercise that rests heavily on a number of circumstances.

For those not familiar with the debate, it comes down to one defining question: Do you trust whoever built the agent enough to install it and let it run on your critical infrastructure?

Agent-based monitoring systems require you to install some software onto the device of interest – or compile it into the code of your precious applications. That often puts IT and application managers on edge:

  • What if it breaks the server?
  • Can you be sure it does not have a memory leak?
  • Does it use a lot of the local CPU for its own processing?
  • Is it secure? Does it use encrypted communications?
  • Do we have to put one on every server?
  • How do I choose which servers to put it on?
  • How often do patches come out?
  • Do they work in virtualized environments as well?
  • Will this one conflict with the five other agents I had to install on this server?

Agentless Transaction MonitoringOnce agents are installed, they can provide an incredible amount of information about the inner workings of a system or device. It is like turning the lights on an otherwise black box. But the view tends to be limited to the local device where it is installed. And the risk, if not the impact, of the installation can make you hesitate.

Agentless approaches, on the other hand, have been attractive if only for avoiding all this teeth-gnashing. Agentless monitoring does not require software to be installed on your systems – usually it relies on some existing agent or interface that is part of a device, such as a native service or daemon – or it consumes some “opportunistic” source of data, such as a syslog file. These data sources are usually available or being generated, regardless of monitoring, and can be accessed without major modifications to the critical infrastructure.

One thing to determine, when considering an opportunistic source of data, is just how rich the information is. It is true these sources are rarely as rich as an agent-based source…But there are notable exceptions. When the opportunistic data source is network traffic, there are a great number of advantages worth noting:

  • always on – no additional configuration of the servers required
  • a very rich source of data
  • carries at least two levels of information – network and application
  • easily accessible (e.g. through the SPAN port of a switch)
  • data access independent of critical infrastructure
  • views across most or all participating devices (depending on network topology)

You might also like

AntiVirus vs Antispyware vs "Security Suites"

by dmrcasf

One thing first: You stated: "... or have multiple AV programs in order to catch all possible problems."
It is actually never a good idea to have more than one Anti-Virus program actively running at one time; their actions can conflict with each other, causing crashes, hangs, and other problems. Note that this is NOT true of Anti-Spyware programs (also called "Anti-Malware" programs)- having more than one antispyware program monitoring your system is a Good Thing.
Remember that your McAfee Security Suite contains not only an anti-virus program, but also an antispyware program, a firewall, and a few other security/privacy-protection tools

Contec Medical Systems Co.,Ltd CONTEC CMS5000B Pulse Rate, SpO2, NIBP Medical Vital Signs Monitoring Device
Health and Beauty (Contec Medical Systems Co.,Ltd)
  • Be applicable for adult, pediatric and neonatal for all-round monitoring, easy operation and high cost performance.Be applicable for medicine, surgery, operating...
  • With user-friendly interface.Display with 2.4(320¡Á240) color TFT LCD and blue highlight LED.

Senate panel OKs $51 billion for Commerce, Justice, Science  —
One sticking point is the House's desire to limit funding for the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace, a plan designed to come up with a new system for managing identities online.

Windows NT Performance Monitoring, Benchmarking, and Tuning
Book (Pearson Education Ltd.)
AXIS COMMUNICATION  INC. Axis 214 Ptz Network Camera Pan Tilt Zoom Day/night 2 Way Audio
  • 214 PTZ Network Camera
  • Brand: Axis
  • 246004
  • Axis 214 PTZ Network Camera is a high performance camera for professional surveillance and remote monitoring
  • It combines a high quality color camera with the flexibility of remote pan/tilt/zoom operations through operator control
3.5" TFT Color Display Wireless Video Intercom Doorbell Door Phone Intercom System
Photography (TOMTOP)
  • 2.4GHz launch frequency, Approx 300 meters barrier free remote control distance.
  • With micro-processing technology, auto-remote control, excellent performance and high reliability.
  • 3.5 TFT color display. Time shown on the indoor monitor. argeable lithium battery through mini use charger.
  • 0.3Mega pixel camera. Monitor can take/save/view more than 100 photos automatically.
  • Clear night-viewing, 24 hours monitoring, calling, speaking and unlocking remote controlling etc.
Software (hp)
  • You can physically provision your operating system to bare-metal servers for firmware, BIOS, and HP Smart Array updating.
  • Get comprehensive monitoring of system health and performance through HP Systems Insight Manager (SIM), including phone home and warranty and service contract...
  • You can take control of your remote servers whether the operating system is running or offline.
  • Measure your power usage for individual server or group of servers with HP Insight Control.
  • Fine-tuned for provisioning HP ProLiant Gen8 Servers using PXE-free installation.

Related Posts

Copyright © . All Rights Reserved